Annual Muse Award Winners
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

All About the 2003 Muse Award Winners: Programs Emphasizing Two-Way Communication

Live from the Heart broadcastGold: Live from the Heart
Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago

Distance learning program: http://www.livefromtheheart.org

The judges said:
"Live from the Heart lives up to its title in every dimension. It teaches the relationships between life and science, motivates student and families to live in better health, while at the same time instills awe at the deeply human vulnerabilities inherent in the body. This project goes well beyond just a museum educational program for students. It could be effective for most any audience. I hope the project team can publish its methodology so the rest of us can see how they achieved such a brilliant program… This program is excellent in all respects. The museum has used community resources - excellent teaching hospitals - to add to its wonderful museum gallery exhibition. The web site is engaging and aimed at three different audiences; the videoconference experience, which includes a written journal as well as a follow-up activity, is something participants will not soon forget. The logistics of putting together a program like this are daunting; the museum deserves to be recognized and commended for not only succeeding, but for succeeding so well."

A Tip From the Producers:
"Partnership, partnership, partnership! The Museum found a great partner in Advocate Christ Medical Center. Both institutions are committed to educating the greater community--especially students--about heart disease. This program is a success because of the dedication, commitment
and vision of both partners."



Screenshot from Jefferson's West online gameSilver: Jefferson's West
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation

Distance learning program: http://www.history.org/history/teaching/jeff_west/
Web game demo: http://www.eduweb.com/portfolio/jeffwest

The judges said:
"The content of the game and other materials on the web are well conceived and presented—I loved using the website. The electronic fieldtrip was highly sophisticated with good balance of living history and Q&A presentation. I particularly like the Web game with its ability to move in different directions to explore and collect data. A good example of how integrated technology (electronic field trip and website) can bring specific content directly into classrooms…The combination of the teacher's guide the live videoconference experience and the website resources make for a comprehensive educational package and a wealth of resources for the user. The archive of Q and A make the presentation useful far beyond the duration of the live experience."

A Tip From the Producers:
"The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, as the largest outdoor living history museum in the United States, offers a wealth of 18th century resources to visitors, historians, educators and web developers. Those resources must be used with care always being conscious of the appropriateness to the project and with due attention to intellectual property rights. The “Jefferson’s West” web adventure took on a “permissions” life of its own however. Right from the beginning of the project, it was apparent to both the Foundation’s Education Outreach department and the web developer, Educational Web Adventures (Eduweb), that most of the imagery would have to come from other museums, historical societies, Native American groups, private artists and musicians. The collaborative nature of the project would mean that many people, both within the Foundation and at Eduweb, were working simultaneously on various aspects of the design and execution. Eduweb created an online “Eduweb Project Site” which facilitated the movement, management and creative use of all of the design aspects and assets. This approach greatly facilitated the organization of one of the critical aspects of the project: Rights and Permissions. The team realized that since most of Colonial Williamsburg’s resources are focused upon the eighteenth-century, that we would need to develop relationships with fellow institutions especially for period artwork. We discovered that many institutions have not yet established procedures for requests that are for non-print usage of their assets. We worked with them to design a procedure to both utilize their wonderful paintings and images, but also to protect their property rights. In this arena, we are not yet a paperless society! It is essential to keep a “paper trail” and request all permissions in writing, even if that is done through email. Some of the guidelines that we used include: keep web images to 72 dpi; use proper citation either on or below the image, as “roll over,” or on a separate “credits” page; be specific on details such as how long the site will be posted and whether it may be accessed by the public or registered users; and always provide the asset owner with a screen shot of the page upon which the asset resides. Additionally, be prepared to pay for photography costs, use fees and permission fees, which can vary widely among institutions. Shopping around is a good idea since one is likely to find the same or similar asset at an institution that has a more “friendly” fee structure for non-profit or educational organizations. Our mantra has been, “Always ask for permission to use anything,” and “Get it in writing!”


More Muse Winners:

Art  |  History and Culture  |  Science  |  Promotion of an Institution  |  Collection Database or Reference 
Two-Way Communication